“For all the blather about O’Connor’s moderation and pragmatism and motherly instincts, Mommie Dearest signed on to the most monstrous opinion in the history of the court, Stenberg v. Carhart, which proclaimed a heretofore unnoticed constitutional right to puncture the skull of a half-delivered baby and suction its brains out – just as the framers so clearly intended”. –Ann Coulter
Search
Amen! Ann nails it again!
Yeah… the framers also intended for black folk to be three-fifths of a man and for only white, landed, men to vote. So… I don’t buy it. Ann is vicious and will pay for her crimes by having to spend the afterlife married to james carville.
Hey Nebur,
Many of the framers had serious qualms with slavery, the picture you paint does not give a complete picture of the early colonization days at all.
But regardless, you’re missing Coulter’s point. Being that, just as slavery was enhanced on constitutional grounds by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case, the Stenberg v. Carhart case enhanced one of the most gruesome forms of modern day slavery today, abortion, yet O’Connor sided in favor of it.
The Supreme Court dropped the ball in Stenberg v. Carhart, but Ann Coulter isn’t God. She can make her point without going on a rave and appearing out of control.
Agreed Paul.